Home Page RESTRICTED AREA | SITEMAP

> Network information
> Network activities
> Cluster 1
> Status
> Judgement
> Stack emission
> Trace element contents
> Environmental impact
> Test methods
> Regulations
> Framework
> Conclusions
> Articles
> Cluster 2
> Cluster 3
> Cluster 4
> Task Group 1
> Task Group 2
> Task Group 3
> Task Group 4
> Task Group 5
> Network output
> External links
> Contact

 

Search the website

Environmental impact to soil and groundwater


Testing framework

A robust and scientifically sound, while practical, framework for characterisation of environmental behaviour of soils, sludges, sediments, wastes and constructions materials in a range of applications and exposure scenarios has been developed. The framework is a tiered approach, allowing the user to select the level of testing and evaluation required based on the degree of conservatism needed, prior information available, and balancing costs of testing against benefits from more detailed information.

Test methods

Worldwide there are many leaching tests. However, most of them are single step leaching tests, which give very limited information and do not allow establishing systematic relationships between materials, nor do they allow interpretation of the information in relation to possible environmental impact. For that purpose more extended testing is needed. Below the characterisation tests suitable for assessing impact from a wide range of materials in a wide range of scenarios.

Basic characterisation test approach

The combination of pH dependence and percolation test for granular materials and the combination of pH dependence and tank test for monolithic materials form the basis for judging of environmental impact in more than 80 % of the cases and for almost any material. In some specific cases additional properties (redox and particle size effects) may need to be taken into account, but such aspects are best dealt with in the scenario description for the application considered. This basic approach provides comparability between productions and across different fields (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Basic test approach

Leaching test data for cement-based materials

Using LeachXS (database/expert system Leaching) the experimental data for more than 50 cement mortars are compared. In Figure 2 an illustration is given for Cr and Zn leaching from cement mortar. This illustrates for Cr very significant differences in leaching as a function of pH, where content does not show such major differences. For Zn the range in leachability for cements from widely different sources does not scatter so much in the pH dependence test. In the tank test (service life) the results scatter much less than in the pH stat, which is caused by the diffusion dominated release process (Cr about 2 orders of magnitude; Zn about one order of magnitude).


Figure 2: Cr and Zn leaching from cement mortar

Cr reduction

A new EU regulation on Cr reduction in cements (EU Directive 2003/53/EC, January 15th, 2005) will come in force shortly. The objective is to reduce the formation of chromate upon wetting cement and the occupational exposure of the skin due to this chemical. The method to be applied involves an extraction with water and is analysed spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. From figure B it is clear that there is no direct relationship between Cr VI in cement and total Cr in cement. The Cr VI measurements may have been carried out at a time beyond the time scale considered safe for having an active ingredient. This implies that some data should have been lower than observed here. This aspect can become a serious limitation. The relationship between leachable Cr VI (All Cr leached at pH > 7 is chromate) and total Cr is lacking for blast furnace slag (BFS) cement, blended cement, fly ash cement, lime cement and Cr reduced cements. The shelf life of Cr reducing additions are limited in most cases, which could pose a problem in the market. For CEM I, there appears to be a rather good correlation between leachable Cr VI and total Cr (Figure 3). This relationship shows that a more or less fixed fraction of the total Cr entering the kiln is converted to Cr VI. Leachable Cr (L/S=10, pH 9 - 10, 24 hrs) mg/kg = 0.11 (± 0.02) * Total Cr (mg/kg) This relationship is applicable to Portland cement only.

Figure 3: Relationship between Cr IV and Cr in cement

BFS cement and blended cements containing slag all show a low Cr VI leachability. Thus blending of cement with slag reduces Cr VI leachability drastically.

Hierarchy in testing

Once the leaching character of a material is well established there is no need to test all parameters relevant for regulations as not all parameters will be critical in a given matrix. In addition, the level of testing can be reduced to one or two step procedure, provided the results are presented in conjunction with the previous characterisation data. Several existing single step procedures can be placed in perspective to these characterisation methods. and may be used

Impact evaluation in different scenarios

A limited set of scenarios is relevant to assess the impact to soil and groundwater. These comprise:

  • a scenario for drinking water pipes of concrete
  • a scenario for basins and concrete structures permanent in contact with water
  • a scenario for intermittent exposure to rain
  • a scenario for debris (recycling, reuse) with different particles size distributions

< Back

Top of page

© Copyright 2003 by ECOserve